This week, after almost a year, I completed my first
transcription assignment for FreeCEN, the project to make all census returns
for the nineteenth century available for researchers to search on line without
cost. It was all very interesting,
because the places and many of the family names were familiar to me from
childhood. Not until it was finished did
I learn that I’d been ‘thrown in at the deep end’, with one of the largest
Pieces, well over 7,000 individual entries, covering ten towns and
villages. The last section was the easiest, because there were fewer items of information for each individual, but at the same time it was one of the saddest ... it covered the workhouse
at Stradbroke.
It was certainly a place that no one wanted to go if
they could possibly avoid it. It was
made so deliberately, to discourage people from taking advantage of ‘something
for nothing’; if you’ve ever visited one of the workhouses that have been
preserved as sites of ‘educational
tourism’ - for example those at Gressenhall in Norfolk or Southwell in
Nottinghamshire - it’s easy to imagine how well they fulfilled that aim.
As I wrote down the names of the 160 people recorded
in this particular institution in north Suffolk, and against each one noted
their marital condition, their gender and age and the sinister word ‘inmate’, I
found myself wondering why it was each was there. I spotted the odd married couple, but most
of them were either widowed or were quite young, or children. Had they just fallen on bad times, unable to
get work, or were there more acute reasons?
One trio in particular stuck in my memory, and once
the task was finished and submitted, I decided to do a little digging into the
records in an attempt to piece together the story of these three girls named
Roberts. Clara was 4, Mary 3 and (the one
that caught my eye in the first place) Eliza, only 12 days old. There was nothing on the page to indicate
that they were sisters ... just the fact that they were all together. Where was their mother ... their father? Had they parked their
children there because there was no one else to look after them while they tried to provide for their tiny family? With no obvious answers I came back to the
fact that, only twelve days ago, this young woman had given birth. She wouldn’t be out working .. but she wasn’t
there in the workhouse either.
Finding baby Eliza’s birth registration on the GRO’s
new birth register search website told me her mother’s maiden name – Moss – and
the marriage register index showed that George Roberts and Eliza Moss had
married in the June quarter of 1860.
There was no sign of them as a family in 1861’s census, however. I did find Eliza, living with her parents and
two young siblings in the village of Wingfield, conspicuously under her new
married name and described as ‘married’, but with no husband present. She was described as a ‘dealer’s wife’. I couldn't find any trace of George after his
marriage.
I found the family again in 1871, still in the same place:
Eliza’s parents, her young brother now a 12-year-old scholar, and an Emily
Roberts, described as ‘granddaughter’, aged 9. This Emily was shown as born in her grandparents’ village, The workhouse entries showed Clara and Mary born in nearby
Syleham. No birth registration could be
found for any of these three: Emily, Clara or Mary. However, each was baptised in Wingfield:
Emily at ten days old, Clara and Mary together when Mary was about three
months. In each case the child was
described as the ‘daughter of George and his wife Eliza, late Moss’.
Childbirth was a hazardous business in those days. If Eliza had been living apart from the
family with her two younger daughters, making her own living as best she could,
her body was probably not in the fittest condition to survive another
birth. I checked the death registers; sure enough, her death was recorded in the June quarter of 1871, aged 29. The burial register confirmed my
suspicions. It showed that she was
buried in Wingfield on 25th March, just four days after her little girl was
born. My guess is that she never
recovered from the birth; the workhouse authorities probably had her parents
noted as next of kin, and the burial took place as soon as arrangements could
be made. The register gave her home as
Syleham.
There is a happy ending to the tale, however. I decided to see what happened to the three
girls in the next ten years. In 1881, I
found them in the nearby village of Weybread at the unlikely - but clearly
identified - ‘Holiday House’. Here lived
James and Anna Ablett, tile maker and laundress, along with their nephew,
George Leggett, also a tile maker.
Living with them were Mary Jane and Eliza Roberts, aged 12 and 10, described
as orphans and scholars. And who should
be visiting on census night but Clara, described as a 17-year-old domestic
servant (although she was actually only a month over fifteen .. not an
infrequent occurence). Eliza’s
birthplace was correctly shown as Stradbroke, but the other two gave Wingfield,
their grandparents’ home ... putting the past behind them?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Following a spate of spam comments, all comments on this blog are moderated. Only genuine comments on the content will be published or responded to.